200多萬閲讀的AI 提示詞手冊：你訂閲的 Claude，可能只用了 10%
整理版優先睇
呢篇文章整理咗20個高質AI提示詞，覆蓋研究、寫作、職業、日常生活同學習，教你真正發揮Claude嘅潛力。
呢篇文章源自一條爆紅嘅推文，原作者列咗20個高質量提示詞，目標係幫人用盡Claude嘅能力。作者指出大多數人只係用咗Claude嘅10%，淨係問問題、改寫、總結，完全浪費咗。
作者將提示詞分成五個場景：深度研究、寫作、職業、日常生活、學習。每個提示詞都有詳細嘅英文模板同用法，例如多源信息綜合、唱反調模式、風格模仿、薪資談判角色扮演等等。佢強調，真正嘅變量係提示詞嘅質量，而唔係模型本身。
整體結論係：與其浪費時間，不如用呢啲模板建立自己嘅提示詞庫，咁先可以將AI變成你嘅健身教練、語言老師、戰略顧問。文章仲講咗點樣真正用得上，包括複製模板、調整細節、反覆練習。
- 文章提供20個高質量提示詞，分為五個場景：深度研究、寫作、職業、日常生活、學習。
- 每個提示詞都有完整嘅英文模板同用法說明，可以直接複製使用。
- 作者強調，多數人只用到Claude 10%嘅能力，提升提示詞質量先係關鍵。
- 呢啲提示詞唔止Claude用得，其他模型都可以，但效果有細微差異。
- 建議將模板當作基礎，根據自己情況調整，建立專屬嘅提示詞庫。
多源信息綜合
You are a senior research analyst. Your job is to synthesize multiple sources into one definitive brief that is more useful than any individual source. Here are [NUMBER] articles / papers / reports on [TOPIC]: [PASTE ALL SOURCES] Produce a structured synthesis with these exact sections: 1. CORE CONSENSUS — What all sources agree on (3-5 points) 2. KEY CONFLICTS — Where sources contradict each other, and why 3. CRITICAL GAPS — What none of them cover, but is important to understand this topic fully 4. STRONGEST CLAIM — The single most evidence-backed insight across all sources 5. ACTIONABLE TAKEAWAY — One concrete thing I should do or decide based on this Rules: - Do not summarize each article separately. Synthesize across all of them. - Flag which source is most credible and why. - If a claim appears in only one source, mark it as unverified. - Maximum 600 words total.
唱反調模式
You are a brilliant, ruthless critic. Your only job is to destroy this idea. Not politely. Not constructively. Find every crack. Here is my idea / plan / decision: [DESCRIBE IT IN AS MUCH DETAIL AS POSSIBLE] Attack it across 4 dimensions: 1. FLAWED ASSUMPTIONS — What am I taking for granted that might be wrong? 2. EXECUTION RISKS — Where is this most likely to break in practice? 3. MARKET / HUMAN REALITY — What am I ignoring about how people or systems actually behave? 4. THE FATAL FLAW — If there is one thing that could kill this entirely, what is it? Rules: - Don't offer solutions or improvements. Only criticize. - Don't soften your language. Be direct. - If an assumption is so obvious I've probably already thought of it, skip it. Only surface things I likely haven't considered. - End with: "The strongest argument against this in one sentence:" — make it devastating.
善意建構
I disagree with this position: [STATE THE POSITION CLEARLY] My current view: [WHY YOU DISAGREE] Build the strongest possible steelman of the opposing position. Assume the smartest, most informed people who hold this view have deeply considered it and have good reasons. Structure your steelman as follows: 1. THE CORE INSIGHT — What is the fundamental truth this position is built on? 2. THE EVIDENCE — What data, history, or logic supports it most powerfully? 3. WHERE MY VIEW IS WEAKEST — What does this position reveal about the blind spots in my own thinking? 4. THE STRONGEST SINGLE ARGUMENT — One paragraph that a brilliant advocate of this position would deliver Rules: - Do not include counter-arguments or caveats to the steelman. That is my job, not yours. - Do not tell me you personally disagree with the position. - Argue as if you genuinely believe it. - The goal is for me to walk away thinking: "I can see why intelligent people believe this."
思維模型搭建
You are a world-class teacher. Your job is not to give me information — it's to give me a framework I can think with. Topic: [TOPIC] My current level: [ZERO / SOME BASICS / INTERMEDIATE] Why I want to understand this: [YOUR GOAL OR CONTEXT] Teach this topic using 3-5 mental models. For each model: - NAME: What is this model called? - CORE IDEA: Explain it in 2-3 sentences as if I'm intelligent but completely new to this - HOW IT APPLIES HERE: Show exactly how this model explains something about [TOPIC] - CONCRETE EXAMPLE: A real-world example I can immediately visualize - COMMON MISTAKE: What do people get wrong when they don't use this model? After all models: show me how they connect to each other. What does understanding all of them together reveal that none of them alone can show? End with one question I should be able to answer if I've understood this correctly.
內容片段
You are a senior research analyst. Your job is to synthesize multiple sources into one definitive brief that is more useful than any individual source.
Here are [NUMBER] articles / papers / reports on [TOPIC]:
[PASTE ALL SOURCES]
Produce a structured synthesis with these exact sections:
1. CORE CONSENSUS — What all sources agree on (3-5 points)
2. KEY CONFLICTS — Where sources contradict each other, and why
3. CRITICAL GAPS — What none of them cover, but is important to understand this topic fully
4. STRONGEST CLAIM — The single most evidence-backed insight across all sources
5. ACTIONABLE TAKEAWAY — One concrete thing I should do or decide based on this
Rules:
- Do not summarize each article separately. Synthesize across all of them.
- Flag which source is most credible and why.
- If a claim appears in only one source, mark it as unverified.
- Maximum 600 words total.深度研究場景
呢個場景嘅提示詞專為需要快速掌握大量資訊嘅人設計，例如分析師、學生、決策者。用佢哋嚟綜合多個來源、挑戰自己嘅想法、或者建立思維框架。
- 1 多源信息綜合：一次過整合多篇文章，產出統一嘅研究簡報，慳返90分鐘閲讀時間。
- 2 唱反調模式：用最猛烈嘅火力攻擊你嘅計劃，揾出潛在致命漏洞。
- 3 善意建構：幫對手建構最強版本嘅論點，正視自己嘅盲點。
- 4 思維模型搭建：用3-5個思維模型教一個新領域，令你真正理解而唔係死記。
寫作場景
寫作類提示詞適合任何需要輸出文字嘅人，無論係文章、email定社交媒體。佢哋針對風格模仿、編輯、受眾調整同擴寫。
- 1 風格模仿：分析你嘅寫作風格，然後用你嘅語氣寫出新文章，告別AI味。
- 2 毒舌編輯：徹底摧毀你嘅草稿，只留低值得發表嘅版本。
- 3 一個文本，五種受眾：將同一段文字改寫畀初學者、專家、懷疑者、記者同CEO，睇清自己諗法。
- 4 要點擴寫成文章：將零碎諗法變成結構完整嘅成稿，唔會加新內容。
職業場景
職業類提示詞專為求職、談判同職場溝通而設，幫你喺關鍵時刻準備充足。角色扮演同模擬係最大亮點。
- 1 薪資談判角色扮演：同AI扮演嘅招聘經理實時談判，練熟反對意見同反擊策略。
- 2 面試模擬器：根據JD進行完整面試，每個答案都有結構化反饋。
- 3 簡歷變形術：一份簡歷針對三個唔同職位調整，重點推到最前。
- 4 棘手對話準備：畫出對話地圖，開場白、對方反應、回應逐字準備。
- 5 領英Bio重寫：吸啱嘅人、趕走錯嘅人，五個版本任揀。
日常生活場景
日常類提示詞幫你解決生活入面嘅決策疲勞，例如煮飯、睇合同、理財。將重複性任務交畀AI，慳返心力。
- 1 每週餐食計劃 + 購物清單：按你嘅偏好似整7日飲食計劃，仲連分類購物清單。
- 2 法律文檔翻譯官：將份合約譯成白話，話你知最危險嘅條款同要問嘅問題。
- 3 個人理財體檢器：分析你嘅開支，確認錢漏咗去邊，俾具體建議。
學習場景
學習類提示詞專門設計俾想快速掌握新技能或知識嘅人。結構化計劃同系統思維係核心工具。
- 1 說書人模式：將複雜資訊變成一個令人難忘嘅故事，適合教學或簡報。
- 2 個人品牌定位：幫你定義清楚嘅品牌本質、定位同內容支柱。
- 3 學習計劃生成器：按你嘅時間同目標設計四星期學習計劃，包埋資源同練習。
- 4 系統思維圖譜：分析一個系統嘅組件、反饋迴路同槓桿點，揾出關鍵改變點。
昨天刷推特，見到一篇長文，超過200萬閲讀，6000幾個收藏，由AI圈一路傳到效率圈、職場圈，連朋友圈都有人轉發。
篇帖嘅核心觀點如下：
作者列出咗 20個高質素提示詞，覆蓋深度研究、寫作、職業、日常生活、學習呢五個場景。
我仔細睇過呢啲提示詞，都覺得值得收藏，所以整理咗一篇文章，喺度同大家分享。
篇文章會回答三件事：
嗰條爆款帖子原文到底講咗啲乜----20個提示詞完整翻譯，英文模板可以直接複製
呢啲提示詞淨係可以畀Claude用咩？----梗係唔係啦，其他模型都可以用，不過唔同模型有少少差異
你收藏咗之後，點樣先至真正用得着？----呢點我覺得幾重要
一、原文翻譯：20個令AI真正做嘢嘅提示詞
你每個月畀20蚊美金畀Claude。大多數人淨係用咗佢10%嘅能力。
問個問題。改寫一段話。總結一份文件。呢啲就係普通同Claude嘅日常。
呢啲唔係叫用Claude，呢啲係叫浪費Claude。
Claude可以係你嘅健身教練、語言老師、談判訓練師、財務分析師、文字編輯、戰略顧問。唔係「大致接近」，係字面意義上嘅。唯一嘅變數，就係你提示詞嘅質素。
下面呢20個prompt，覆蓋咗一個真實嘅人一年入面會遇到嘅真實場景。需要嘅就拎去用，唔需要嘅就跳過。將佢哋當作模板，去搭建屬於你自己嘅提示詞庫。
深度研究
1. 多源信息綜合
唔好再一篇一篇咁讀5篇文章啦。將佢哋全部貼入一個對話框，等AI提煉出一份統一嘅、消除衝突嘅簡報佢可以發現單一篇文章漏咗嘅嘢，可以識別出文章之間嘅矛盾。本來要花你90分鐘閲讀嘅事，用呢個prompt，3分鐘就搞得掂。
You are a senior research analyst. Your job is to synthesize multiple sources into one definitive brief that is more useful than any individual source.
Here are [NUMBER] articles / papers / reports on [TOPIC]:
[PASTE ALL SOURCES]
Produce a structured synthesis with these exact sections:
1. CORE CONSENSUS — What all sources agree on (3-5 points)
2. KEY CONFLICTS — Where sources contradict each other, and why
3. CRITICAL GAPS — What none of them cover, but is important to understand this topic fully
4. STRONGEST CLAIM — The single most evidence-backed insight across all sources
5. ACTIONABLE TAKEAWAY — One concrete thing I should do or decide based on this
Rules:
- Do not summarize each article separately. Synthesize across all of them.
- Flag which source is most credible and why.
- If a claim appears in only one source, mark it as unverified.
- Maximum 600 words total.
2. 唱反調模式
喺你下定決心做某件事之前，等AI用最猛嘅火力嚟反駁佢。唔使客氣。唔好打折。等佢畀出「你點解會輸」嘅最強論證。佢發現嘅漏洞，就係日後會要你命嘅漏洞。
You are a brilliant, ruthless critic. Your only job is to destroy this idea. Not politely. Not constructively. Find every crack.
Here is my idea / plan / decision:
[DESCRIBE IT IN AS MUCH DETAIL AS POSSIBLE]
Attack it across 4 dimensions:
1. FLAWED ASSUMPTIONS — What am I taking for granted that might be wrong?
2. EXECUTION RISKS — Where is this most likely to break in practice?
3. MARKET / HUMAN REALITY — What am I ignoring about how people or systems actually behave?
4. THE FATAL FLAW — If there is one thing that could kill this entirely, what is it?
Rules:
- Don't offer solutions or improvements. Only criticize.
- Don't soften your language. Be direct.
- If an assumption is so obvious I've probably already thought of it, skip it. Only surface things I likely haven't considered.
- End with: "The strongest argument against this in one sentence:" — make it devastating.
3. 善意建構任何立場
你唔認同某個觀點。先唔好急住否定，等AI幫你「善意建構」——將對方最聰明、最有說服力嘅版本寫出嚟。唔係為咗改變你嘅想法，係為咗令你以後唔會再被人打個措手不及。
I disagree with this position: [STATE THE POSITION CLEARLY]
My current view: [WHY YOU DISAGREE]
Build the strongest possible steelman of the opposing position. Assume the smartest, most informed people who hold this view have deeply considered it and have good reasons.
Structure your steelman as follows:
1. THE CORE INSIGHT — What is the fundamental truth this position is built on?
2. THE EVIDENCE — What data, history, or logic supports it most powerfully?
3. WHERE MY VIEW IS WEAKEST — What does this position reveal about the blind spots in my own thinking?
4. THE STRONGEST SINGLE ARGUMENT — One paragraph that a brilliant advocate of this position would deliver
Rules:
- Do not include counter-arguments or caveats to the steelman. That is my job, not yours.
- Do not tell me you personally disagree with the position.
- Argue as if you genuinely believe it.
- The goal is for me to walk away thinking: "I can see why intelligent people believe this."
4. 思維模型搭建
任何你搞唔掂嘅領域，等AI用一組「連接起來嘅思維模型」嚟教你。唔係事實，唔係摘要，而係一個你可以拎嚟思考嘅框架。10分鐘之後你可以講畀人聽，亦都可以用喺新場景入面。呢個就係知道同理解嘅分別。
You are a world-class teacher. Your job is not to give me information — it's to give me a framework I can think with.
Topic: [TOPIC]
My current level: [ZERO / SOME BASICS / INTERMEDIATE]
Why I want to understand this: [YOUR GOAL OR CONTEXT]
Teach this topic using 3-5 mental models. For each model:
- NAME: What is this model called?
- CORE IDEA: Explain it in 2-3 sentences as if I'm intelligent but completely new to this
- HOW IT APPLIES HERE: Show exactly how this model explains something about [TOPIC]
- CONCRETE EXAMPLE: A real-world example I can immediately visualize
- COMMON MISTAKE: What do people get wrong when they don't use this model?
After all models: show me how they connect to each other. What does understanding all of them together reveal that none of them alone can show?
End with one question I should be able to answer if I've understood this correctly.
寫作
5. 風格模仿
將你自己嘅3篇文章貼入去，等AI分析你嘅寫作風格——節奏、用詞、句子長度、段落開頭、結尾收尾。然後畀一個主題佢，等佢用你嘅風格寫出嚟。唔係AI味嗰種，係你自己嘅風格。佢輸出嘅嘢，會比你對住空白文件憋出嚟嘅更加接近你想寫嘅。
You are a style analyst and ghostwriter. Your job is to learn how I write — not just what I say, but how I say it — and then reproduce it exactly.
Here are 3 samples of my writing:
SAMPLE 1:
[PASTE]
SAMPLE 2:
[PASTE]
SAMPLE 3:
[PASTE]
Step 1 — Analyze my style across these dimensions:
- Sentence length and rhythm (short punchy / long flowing / mixed)
- Vocabulary level (simple / technical / conversational)
- How I open paragraphs
- How I close ideas
- What I never do (passive voice / filler words / certain structures)
- The "signature move" — one thing that makes my writing instantly recognizable
Step 2 — Write a [FORMAT: thread / article / email / post] about [TOPIC] in my voice.
Rules for Step 2:
- Match my style so closely that I could publish it without editing the voice
- Do not add ideas I wouldn't have — stay in my lane
- If my style is casual, don't make it formal. If it's punchy, don't pad it.
6. 毒舌編輯
將你嘅草稿貼上去。等AI將佢摧毀唔係改進，唔係畀建議，係摧毀。將每一句浪費讀者時間嘅話、每一個站唔住腳嘅觀點、每一個可以刪走嘅詞，全部揪出嚟。由呢場屠殺入面活落嚟嘅版本，先至係值得發表嘅版本。
You are the toughest editor I've ever had. You do not give encouragement. You give an honest assessment of what's working, what isn't, and what needs to go.
Here is my draft:
[PASTE DRAFT]
Edit it across 5 dimensions:
1. CUTS — List every sentence or paragraph that wastes the reader's time. Quote it, then explain why it adds nothing.
2. WEAK IDEAS — Which claims are vague, unsupported, or not earning their place?
3. MISSING — What should be here that isn't? What question does the reader have that I haven't answered?
4. STRUCTURE — Is the order right? Should anything move? Does the opening earn attention? Does the ending land?
5. THE SINGLE BIGGEST PROBLEM — If you could only fix one thing, what is it?
Then: produce the edited version. Cut ruthlessly. Tighten every sentence. Don't add fluff to replace what you cut.
Rules:
- Don't say "great job on X before criticizing." Just edit.
- If the draft is fundamentally broken, say so directly.
- The goal is a version the reader finishes. Not a version that protects my ego.
7. 一個文本，五種受眾
你為一個人寫咗啲嘢。等AI同時將佢改寫成畀5類唔同人睇嘅版本。核心觀點不變，但語氣、用詞、切入角度，完全唔同。一個5歲細路、一個領域專家、一個懷疑論者、一個記者、你哋公司CEO。見到自己嘅想法俾咁多角度折射一次，比任何練習都更加令你睇清自己想表達啲乜。
You are a master communicator. Your job is to take one idea and show how it sounds when translated perfectly for completely different audiences.
Here is my original text:
[PASTE TEXT]
Rewrite it for these 5 audiences. For each version, fully commit to that audience — different vocabulary, different tone, different emphasis, different structure.
VERSION 1 — THE COMPLETE BEGINNER
No jargon. Use analogies. Assume they know nothing but are intelligent.
VERSION 2 — THE DOMAIN EXPERT
Skip the basics. Use precise terminology. Go deeper than the original. They will notice if you oversimplify.
VERSION 3 — THE SKEPTIC
They don't believe this matters. Lead with the strongest evidence. Anticipate their objection and address it before they raise it.
VERSION 4 — THE JOURNALIST (headline + 2 sentences)
One hook headline. Two sentences that capture the most newsworthy angle. Written to make someone click.
VERSION 5 — THE EXECUTIVE (30 seconds)
Three sentences maximum. What is it, why does it matter, what should they do. No context, no buildup.
After all 5 versions: tell me which one is hardest to write well and why.
8. 要點擴寫成文章
你有一堆筆記。零散嘅要點、碎片化嘅想法。等AI將佢哋變成一篇結構完整、可讀嘅成稿。話畀佢知目標字數、目標讀者、語氣。要點係骨架，AI負責補上血肉。你嘅精力放喺思考，唔係排版。
You are a professional writer and editor. I have rough notes. Your job is to turn them into a finished piece without losing any of my ideas or adding ideas I didn't have.
Topic: [TOPIC]
Format: [ARTICLE / POST / REPORT / EMAIL]
Target length: [WORD COUNT]
Audience: [WHO WILL READ THIS AND WHAT THEY CARE ABOUT]
Tone: [FORMAL / CONVERSATIONAL / DIRECT / TECHNICAL]
Goal: [WHAT SHOULD THE READER THINK, FEEL, OR DO AFTER READING?]
Here are my raw notes:
[PASTE BULLET POINTS / FRAGMENTS / ROUGH IDEAS]
Instructions:
- Use every idea I listed. Don't drop anything.
- Fill in the transitions and connective tissue between ideas — that's your job.
- Do not add new ideas I didn't include. You can expand on mine, not invent new ones.
- Structure it with a strong opening that earns attention and a closing that lands.
- If any of my notes are unclear or contradictory, flag them at the end rather than guessing.
Deliver: the full finished piece, then a one-line note on any fragments you were unsure how to use.
職業
9. 薪酬談判角色扮演
大多數人在薪酬談判入面損失成千上萬——只係因為佢哋從來冇練過。等AI扮演你未來嘅僱主，將場景、offer、對方可能嘅反對意見全部畀佢。然後即時傾。AI會頂返嚟，會用對方真係會用嘅話術。等到你走入真實嗰場對話時，你已經練咗十幾次了。
You are a hiring manager at [COMPANY TYPE: startup / enterprise / agency]. You are experienced, professional, and not easily moved. You have a budget constraint and a team dynamic to protect.
The role: [JOB TITLE]
The offer on the table: [CURRENT OFFER]
My actual target: [WHAT I WANT]
My strongest leverage: [COMPETING OFFER / SPECIFIC SKILL / UNIQUE EXPERIENCE]
My weakest point: [GAP IN EXPERIENCE / CAREER CHANGE / NO COMPETING OFFER]
Run a realistic negotiation roleplay with me. You open by confirming the offer.
Rules for you as the hiring manager:
- Use at least 3 of these real objections during the negotiation: "budget is fixed for this level," "it wouldn't be fair to the team," "market data puts this role at X," "we can revisit after 6 months"
- Don't cave easily. Make me work for every dollar.
- If I make a weak argument, push back with a specific counter.
- If I make a strong argument, acknowledge it — but still negotiate.
After the roleplay: give me feedback. What did I do well? What argument did I leave on the table? What was my most effective move?
10. 面試模擬器
將個職位JD貼入去。等AI扮演面試官。佢會問出呢個職位常見嘅真實問題——行為面、技術面、情境面。你回答，佢打分：邊度答得好、邊度太虛、本來應該點講。3輪之後，你走入任何面試都可以從容不迫。
You are a senior interviewer conducting a realistic job interview. You are professional, attentive, and you do not give easy passes.
Here is the job description:
[PASTE FULL JOB DESCRIPTION]
My background: [2-3 SENTENCES ABOUT YOUR EXPERIENCE AND WHAT YOU BRING]
The type of interview: [BEHAVIORAL / TECHNICAL / CASE / MIXED]
Run the interview. Ask one question at a time. Wait for my answer before continuing.
After each answer, give structured feedback:
- STRONG: What worked in my answer
- WEAK: What was vague, missing, or unconvincing
- WHAT I SHOULD HAVE SAID: The key point or structure I didn't use
Then ask the next question.
Cover these areas across the interview: motivation for the role, relevant past experience using STAR format, handling a specific challenge, working style and teamwork, one technical or domain question based on the job description, and one curveball question.
After the final question: give me an overall assessment. Hiring decision (yes/no/maybe) and the one thing that most impacted that decision.
注：STAR法則 = Situation（情境）→ Task（任務）→ Action（行動）→ Result（結果），行為面試常用嘅回答結構。
11. 履歷變形術
你得一份履歷。但係你投嘅每個職位都唔一樣。將份履歷加上3份唔同嘅JD一齊畀AI，等佢產出3個版本，每個版本都將最符合嗰個職位嘅經歷推去最前面。事實冇變。重點完全唔同。你嘅履歷由「邊度都唔得」變成「刀刀精準」。
You are a professional resume writer and career strategist. Your job is to take one person's real experience and position it differently for different roles — without lying, exaggerating, or omitting anything material.
Here is my current resume:
[PASTE FULL RESUME]
Here are 3 job descriptions I'm targeting:
JOB 1: [PASTE JOB DESCRIPTION]
JOB 2: [PASTE JOB DESCRIPTION]
JOB 3: [PASTE JOB DESCRIPTION]
For each job, produce a tailored resume version with these changes:
- Reorder bullet points so the most relevant experience for that role appears first
- Rewrite bullet points to use the exact language and keywords from that job description
- Adjust the summary/headline to speak directly to what that company is looking for
- Remove or de-emphasize experience irrelevant to that specific role
Rules:
- Every fact must remain accurate. Do not invent or inflate anything.
- Use strong action verbs and quantify results wherever my original has numbers.
- Flag any significant gap between what the job requires and what my resume shows — so I can address it in a cover letter.
After all 3 versions: tell me which application has the strongest fit and which has the biggest gap.
12. 棘手對話準備
你要進行一場艱難嘅對話，同你嘅上司、客戶、合夥人。大多數人入去之前準備不足，結果一係講太多，一係講太少。將情況完整描述畀AI，等佢幫你畫一張對話地圖：你應該點開口、對方大概會講乜、每種情況你點樣接。唔係臨場發揮，係有劇本嘅演練。
You are an executive coach and communication strategist. I have a difficult conversation coming up and I need to walk in prepared for every scenario.
Who I'm talking to: [THEIR ROLE AND MY RELATIONSHIP WITH THEM]
What the conversation is about: [THE TOPIC / ISSUE]
What happened: [THE FULL CONTEXT — WHAT LED TO THIS]
My goal: [WHAT I WANT TO ACHIEVE BY THE END]
My fear: [WHAT I'M MOST WORRIED THEY'LL SAY OR DO]
What I must not do: [ANY RED LINES — DON'T APOLOGIZE / DON'T BACK DOWN / ETC.]
Give me:
1. THE OPENING LINE — Exactly how to start. Clear, direct, not aggressive.
2. THEIR 3 MOST LIKELY RESPONSES — Based on the context, what will they probably say?
3. MY RESPONSE TO EACH — Word-for-word how to handle each scenario
4. THE TRAP TO AVOID — The one thing I'm most likely to do in the moment that will derail the conversation
5. THE EXIT — How to close the conversation clearly, regardless of how it goes
Rules:
- Don't make the other person reasonable or easy. Prepare me for pushback.
- Don't give me corporate language. Give me words I'd actually say.
- If my goal is unrealistic given the context, tell me before I walk in.
13. 領英Bio重寫
你嘅領英簡介係三年前花10分鐘寫嘅，一係太謙虛，一係太空洞，將佢貼出嚟，話畀AI知你想吸引咩人、點解，然後等佢畀你出5個版本。你會揀出其中一個，然後疑惑：點解我拖咗咁耐先改。
You are a positioning strategist who specializes in personal branding for professionals. Your job is to rewrite my LinkedIn bio so it works hard — attracting the right people and repelling the wrong ones.
My current bio:
[PASTE CURRENT BIO]
What I actually do: [DESCRIBE YOUR WORK IN PLAIN LANGUAGE]
Who I want to attract: [TYPE OF CLIENTS / EMPLOYERS / COLLABORATORS]
My biggest credibility signal: [BEST RESULT, COMPANY, NUMBER, OR ACHIEVEMENT]
What makes me different from others with the same title: [YOUR ACTUAL EDGE]
Write 5 versions of my LinkedIn headline + summary (combined under 300 characters each):
VERSION 1 — AUTHORITATIVE: Lead with your biggest result or credential. No fluff.
VERSION 2 — CONVERSATIONAL: Write like a human, not a resume. First-person, direct.
VERSION 3 — RESULTS-FOCUSED: Every sentence is a number or outcome. Zero adjectives.
VERSION 4 — NICHE-SPECIFIC: Hyper-targeted to attract exactly [TARGET AUDIENCE]. Others won't get it. That's fine.
VERSION 5 — MINIMAL: Under 100 characters. The essence only.
Banned words: passionate, results-driven, innovative, leveraging, seasoned, dynamic, thought leader.
After all 5: tell me which one will work best for the audience I described and why.
日常生活
14. 每星期餐食計劃 + 購物清單
話畀AI知你嘅飲食偏好、熱量目標、可以接受嘅烹飪時間。佢會出一份完整嘅7日計劃——早午晚三餐——再加一份按超市區域分類嘅購物清單。「今日食咩」呢個困擾你一星期嘅決策疲勞，3分鐘之內一次性解決。
You are a professional nutritionist and meal planning specialist. Build me a realistic 7-day meal plan I will actually follow.
My details:
- Diet type / restrictions: [VEGAN / KETO / GLUTEN-FREE / NO RESTRICTIONS / ETC.]
- Foods I hate: [LIST THEM]
- Calorie target: [NUMBER] per day
- Protein target: [NUMBER]g per day
- Max cooking time per meal: [MINUTES]
- Cooking skill level: [BEGINNER / INTERMEDIATE / ADVANCED]
- Weekly grocery budget: [AMOUNT]
- Number of people eating: [NUMBER]
Produce:
- 7 days of meals: breakfast, lunch, dinner
- Each meal: name, approximate calories, protein, prep time
- Where possible: reuse ingredients across days to reduce waste and cost
- Flag any meal that requires more than [X] minutes — I'll need alternatives for those days
Then produce:
SHOPPING LIST — organized by grocery section (Produce / Proteins / Dairy / Grains / Pantry / Frozen). Include quantities.
MEAL PREP GUIDE — what can I prepare on Sunday to make the week easier?
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST — based on average grocery prices.
15. 法律文件翻譯官
你收到一份合約、一份新嘅服務條款、一份租賃協議、一份私隱政策——有一半你睇唔明。將佢貼入去，等AI翻譯成大白話：你究竟同意咗啲乜、邊幾條最危險、簽字之前應該先問清楚啲乜。令你唔再閉埋眼簽嗰啲會影響你嘅文件。
I need to understand a legal document before I sign it. You are not providing legal advice — you are helping me understand what this document actually says in plain English so I can have an informed conversation with a lawyer or the other party.
Document type: [CONTRACT / LEASE / TERMS OF SERVICE / NDA / EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT / OTHER]
Here is the document:
[PASTE FULL DOCUMENT]
Analyze it across these sections:
1. WHAT I'M AGREEING TO — Summarize the core obligations on my side in plain language. What am I committing to do, pay, or not do?
2. WHAT THEY'RE COMMITTING TO — What are their obligations to me?
3. THE 3 RISKIEST CLAUSES — Which clauses could hurt me most if things go wrong? Quote each one, then explain the risk in plain language.
4. UNUSUAL OR NON-STANDARD — What's in here that's not typical for this type of document? What should I be surprised to see?
5. WHAT'S MISSING — What clauses would normally appear in this type of agreement that aren't here? Does that protect or expose me?
6. QUESTIONS TO ASK BEFORE SIGNING — List the 5 specific questions I should raise with a lawyer or the other party.
Note: This is for my own understanding only, not legal advice.
16. 個人理財體檢器
將你上個月嘅開銷賬單貼入去。等AI分類、揾規律、精確定位錢漏咗去邊。唔係「少啲出街食飯」呢啲廢話建議。係具體到呢個程度：你今個月喺訂閲服務度使咗340蚊美金，其中4個你今個月用咗唔夠一次。呢種程度嘅具體，先至係真係可以改變行為嘅具體。
You are a personal finance analyst. Your job is to look at my actual spending data and give me a specific, honest assessment — not generic advice.
My monthly income after tax: [AMOUNT]
My primary financial goal: [BUILD EMERGENCY FUND / PAY OFF DEBT / INVEST / SAVE FOR X]
Timeline for that goal: [MONTHS / YEARS]
Fixed expenses I cannot cut: [RENT / LOAN PAYMENTS / ETC.]
Here are my expenses from last month:
[PASTE EXPENSE LIST OR BANK STATEMENT — ITEM AND AMOUNT]
Analyze this and produce:
1. CATEGORIZED BREAKDOWN — Group every expense into: Housing / Food / Transport / Subscriptions / Entertainment / Health / Savings / Miscellaneous. Show totals per category and percentage of income.
2. THE 3 BIGGEST LEAKS — Not just "you spend a lot on dining." Specific: which category, how much, compared to a reasonable benchmark for my income level.
3. QUICK WINS — What can I cut or reduce immediately with minimal lifestyle impact? Calculate the exact monthly saving for each.
4. GOAL FEASIBILITY — Given my income and spending, can I realistically hit my goal in my stated timeline? If not, what needs to change?
5. THE ONE THING — If I could only change one behavior this month to make the biggest financial difference, what is it?
Be specific. Quote numbers from my actual data. Do not give me generic advice I could read in any blog post.
17. 旅行規劃師
話畀AI知你要去邊度、有幾多日、預算幾多、係邊種類型嘅旅行者。佢會畀你一份按日排嘅行程——入面有大多數遊客錯過嘅地方：街區入面嘅小店、避開人潮嘅時間技巧、需要提前預訂嘅項目。唔係抄TripAdvisor嘅，係為你度身訂造嘅計劃。
You are a travel specialist who knows [DESTINATION] well — not from guides, but from firsthand experience. Your job is to build me a trip that fits how I actually travel, not a generic tourist itinerary.
Destination: [DESTINATION]
Dates: [ARRIVAL / DEPARTURE]
Duration: [NUMBER OF DAYS]
Group: [SOLO / COUPLE / FAMILY WITH KIDS AGES X / GROUP OF X]
Total budget: [AMOUNT] — breakdown: [FLIGHTS ALREADY BOOKED / ACCOMMODATION NOT YET / ETC.]
Travel style: [RELAXED / PACKED / ADVENTURE / FOOD-FOCUSED / CULTURAL / MIXED]
Things I hate: [TOURIST TRAPS / LARGE CROWDS / OVER-SCHEDULED DAYS / ETC.]
Things I love: [LOCAL FOOD / ARCHITECTURE / NATURE / NIGHTLIFE / MUSEUMS / ETC.]
Physical limitations (if any): [NONE / LIMITED WALKING / ETC.]
Produce:
DAY-BY-DAY ITINERARY — Morning / Afternoon / Evening for each day. Be specific: name actual places, neighborhoods, restaurants. Include realistic travel times between locations.
BOOK IN ADVANCE — What needs to be reserved and how far ahead (tickets, restaurants, tours).
HIDDEN GEMS — 3 things most tourists visiting [DESTINATION] miss entirely.
MONEY BREAKDOWN — Estimated cost per day based on my budget and travel style.
AVOID — 2-3 overhyped places that aren't worth it for the type of traveler I am.
學習
18. 費曼教練
費曼學習法嘅核心：你真正理解一件事，係當你可以用最簡單嘅話將佢講清楚嘅時候。等AI用呢套方法教你——由最簡單嘅開始，每講一層就檢查你明冇明，明咗就加難度。唔明就唔落去。呢啲唔係讀書，呢啲係學習。
You are a master teacher using the Feynman technique. The Feynman method has one rule: you do not move to the next concept until the student has genuinely understood the previous one. Not just nodded. Actually understood.
Topic I want to understand: [TOPIC]
My current level: [ZERO / SOME BASICS / INTERMEDIATE]
Why I want to understand this: [PRACTICAL USE CASE OR GOAL]
How I learn best: [ANALOGIES / EXAMPLES / VISUAL DESCRIPTIONS / STEP-BY-STEP LOGIC]
How to run this session:
1. Start with the most fundamental concept. Explain it in the simplest possible language. No jargon.
2. After your explanation, ask me ONE question that tests whether I understood — not a recall question, a comprehension question.
3. Wait for my answer.
4. If I got it right: acknowledge it briefly and move to the next layer of complexity.
5. If I got it wrong or partly wrong: don't repeat the same explanation. Find a different analogy or framing. Try again.
6. Never explain more than one concept at a time.
7. Use analogies from everyday life — not from the field itself.
Continue until I've understood the full picture.
At the end: ask me to explain the topic back to you in my own words. Tell me what I got right, what I missed, and what I got wrong.
19. 30天課程表
你想學一項新技能，大多數人開始得好好，第二個星期就被資訊量壓垮、放棄——因為佢哋手上面冇地圖。等AI幫你做一份按日排嘅30日課程表：每日學啲乜、按咩順序、每日幾多分鐘、仲有用嚟確認進度嘅檢查點。一項技能由「我想學嘅嘢」，變成「有deadline嘅項目」。
You are a curriculum designer and learning strategist. I want to learn a skill in 30 days with a structured, realistic plan. Your job is to build that plan — not a reading list, an actual doing plan.
Skill: [SKILL]
My starting level: [COMPLETE BEGINNER / SOME EXPOSURE / INTERMEDIATE]
Time available per day: [MINUTES]
Days per week I can commit: [5-7 / 3-4 / WEEKENDS ONLY]
Goal after 30 days: [EXACTLY WHAT I WANT TO BE ABLE TO DO]
How I learn best: [VIDEOS / READING / PRACTICE PROJECTS / FLASHCARDS / MIXED]
Resources I already have: [BOOKS / COURSES / TOOLS / NONE]
Build the curriculum:
WEEK 1 — FOUNDATIONS: What are the 3-4 core concepts I must understand before everything else? Day-by-day tasks.
WEEK 2 — APPLICATION: Move from understanding to doing. What's the first real thing I build, write, or produce?
WEEK 3 — DEPTH: Where do most beginners plateau? Push past it here. Day-by-day tasks.
WEEK 4 — CONSOLIDATION: Review, fix gaps, produce something I'm proud of.
For each day: a specific task (not "study X" — "do X, specifically Y")
CHECKPOINTS at Day 7, 14, 21, 30: A test or task to verify I'm on track. If I fail it, what do I do?
Rules:
- 80% doing, 20% reading or watching
- No day should require more than [MINUTES] of focused time
- Each week should end with something tangible I've produced
20. 蘇格拉底模式
呢個係AI最被低估嘅能力。唔好等佢畀答案你，等佢通過提問嚟教你。你畀一個主題佢。佢問你問題。你回答。佢根據你嘅回答繼續追問，糾正你嘅盲點，引導你靠自己思考走到答案。被動閲讀得到嘅只係熟悉感。蘇格拉底式對話得到嘅先至係知識。分別即刻感受得到。
You are a Socratic teacher. You do not explain things. You ask questions. Through those questions, you guide me to discover the answer myself. This is the most demanding form of teaching — and the most effective.
Topic: [TOPIC]
My goal: [WHAT I WANT TO UNDERSTAND OR BE ABLE TO DO]
My current level: [WHAT I THINK I KNOW / COMPLETE BEGINNER]
Rules you must follow — no exceptions:
1. You start by asking me a single question to reveal what I currently believe about this topic.
2. You never give me the answer directly. Guide me to it through follow-up questions.
3. If I'm wrong, don't correct me. Ask a question that makes me realize I'm wrong.
4. If I'm right, push deeper. Ask the next question that takes me further.
5. If I ask you to just explain it, refuse. Say: "What do you think the answer might be?" and continue.
6. Each question should be one sentence. No preambles.
7. Never ask two questions at once.
You end the session only when I can articulate the key insight in my own words without prompting.
At the end: break character once and tell me — what was the key insight you were guiding me toward? What moment in our dialogue showed you I understood it? What would have been the next question if we'd continued?
20套方法。一份比90分鐘閲讀仲要高效嘅深度研究。一份可以熬過毒舌編輯嘅寫作。一套令艱難對話好似綵排過嘅職業準備。一個幫你處理掉日常決策嘅生活助手。一位用你自己嘅推理嚟教你嘅導師。
呢啲，全部已經包含喺你每個月20蚊美金入面。
二、呢啲提示詞淨係可以畀Claude用咩？
原作者通篇寫嘅係Claude，但其實，呢啲prompt 90%嘅能力係跨模型通用嘅。
你完全可以拎去畀ChatGPT、Gemini、DeepSeek、Kimi、豆包用，效果都唔差。因為呢啲prompt嘅本質係結構化嘅思考框架——角色設定、任務拆解、輸出約束、思維方法——呢啲嘢同具體邊個模型關係唔大。
但用多咗你會發現，模型之間確實有啲細微差異：
例如長上下文處理，Claude 200K、Gemini 2M表現最穩定；ChatGPT 128K居中；DeepSeek 64K。
例如喺進行薪酬談判同面試模擬嘅角色扮演時，Claude最易入戲唔出戲；ChatGPT容易畀温和嘅反駁你；DeepSeek間中會跳出角色解釋。
例如批評嘅鋒利度，Claude同DeepSeek相對敢講真話。
例如中文文風，ChatGPT間中有翻譯腔；Gemini整體偏書面，豆包、Kimi、DeepSeek就唔使講啦。
三、收藏唔等於使用：令呢20個prompt真正用得着嘅方法
大多數人會讀完呢篇，收藏起嚟，然後轉過頭繼續等AI幫佢哋總結電郵。
我自己都係咁。
呢個唔係我哋懶。係因為想用同真係用起嚟之間，仲隔住一層。
你想用嘅嗰個瞬間，要經歷呢5步：
如果你真係想令呢篇文章產生價值——可以真正用起嚟，可以用下面嘅方法。
第1步：砍——由20個收斂到5個
唔好嘗試記住20個prompt。記唔住。
記你生活入面重複出現嘅5個瞬間。
例如：
你生活入面嘅瞬間 | 對應嘅prompt |
我要做個決定了 | 唱反調（#2） |
我喺反對一個觀點 | 善意建構（#3） |
我準備發出去啦 | 毒舌編輯（#6） |
我要開個難嘅會 | 棘手對話準備（#12） |
我想真正搞掂呢個 |
如果你係程序員、創業者、文字工作者、學生、求職者……你可以揀出自己嘅5個高頻瞬間。其他15個等佢哋瞓覺備用。
第2步：改——將呢5個改成你自己嘅版本
通用prompt永遠都比唔上你度身訂造咁好用。
花一個下晝，將呢5個prompt改成你自己嘅：
佔位符替換成你常用嘅語境
加上你嘅限制同邊界
用中文重寫一次（用中文模型時響應更好）
第3步：嵌——令佢哋出現喺你夠得着嘅地方
就係放喺你最易揾到而又唔會唔記得嘅地方。
最後，附上原文：
https://x.com/AnatoliKopadze/status/2049492553133629950；
作者：Anatoli Kopadze
多謝你睇到呢度，如果覺得有用，畀個關注，唔會迷路~
昨天刷推，刷到一篇長文，2M+ 閲讀，6000多收藏，從 AI 圈一路轉到效率圈、職場圈，朋友圈裏也有人在轉。
帖子的核心觀點如下：
作者列了 20 個高質量提示詞，覆蓋深度研究、寫作、職業、日常生活、學習五個場景。
我仔細看過這些提示詞，也覺得值得收藏，所以整理了一篇文章，在這裏分享一下。
文章會回答三件事：
那條爆款帖子原文到底說了什麼----20 個提示詞完整翻譯，英文模板可直接複製
這些提示詞只能給 Claude 用嗎？----當然不是，其他模型也可以用，但不同的模型有細微差異
你收藏了之後，怎麼真正能用上？----這點我覺得挺重要的
一、原文翻譯：20 個讓 AI 真正幹活的提示詞
你每個月付 20 美元給 Claude。大多數人只用了它 10% 的能力。
問個問題。改寫一段話。總結一份文檔。這就是普通人和 Claude 的日常。
這不叫用 Claude，這叫浪費Claude。
Claude 可以是你的健身教練、語言老師、談判訓練師、財務分析師、文字編輯、戰略顧問。不是「大致接近」，是字面意義上的。唯一的變量，是你提示詞的質量。
下面這 20 個 prompt，覆蓋了一個真實的人一年裏會遇到的真實場景。需要的拿去用，不需要的跳過。把它們當作模板，去搭建屬於你自己的提示詞庫。
深度研究
1. 多源信息綜合
別再一篇一篇地讀 5 篇文章了。把它們全部粘進一個對話框，讓 AI 提煉出一份統一的、消除衝突的簡報。它能發現單篇文章漏掉的東西，能識別出文章之間的矛盾。本來要花你 90 分鐘閲讀的事情，用這個prompt，3 分鐘就能完成。
You are a senior research analyst. Your job is to synthesize multiple sources into one definitive brief that is more useful than any individual source.
Here are [NUMBER] articles / papers / reports on [TOPIC]:
[PASTE ALL SOURCES]
Produce a structured synthesis with these exact sections:
1. CORE CONSENSUS — What all sources agree on (3-5 points)
2. KEY CONFLICTS — Where sources contradict each other, and why
3. CRITICAL GAPS — What none of them cover, but is important to understand this topic fully
4. STRONGEST CLAIM — The single most evidence-backed insight across all sources
5. ACTIONABLE TAKEAWAY — One concrete thing I should do or decide based on this
Rules:
- Do not summarize each article separately. Synthesize across all of them.
- Flag which source is most credible and why.
- If a claim appears in only one source, mark it as unverified.
- Maximum 600 words total.
2. 唱反調模式
在你下決心做某件事之前，讓 AI 用最猛的火力來反駁它。不要客氣。不要打折扣。讓它給出"你為什麼會輸"的最強論證。它發現的漏洞，就是日後會要你命的漏洞。
You are a brilliant, ruthless critic. Your only job is to destroy this idea. Not politely. Not constructively. Find every crack.
Here is my idea / plan / decision:
[DESCRIBE IT IN AS MUCH DETAIL AS POSSIBLE]
Attack it across 4 dimensions:
1. FLAWED ASSUMPTIONS — What am I taking for granted that might be wrong?
2. EXECUTION RISKS — Where is this most likely to break in practice?
3. MARKET / HUMAN REALITY — What am I ignoring about how people or systems actually behave?
4. THE FATAL FLAW — If there is one thing that could kill this entirely, what is it?
Rules:
- Don't offer solutions or improvements. Only criticize.
- Don't soften your language. Be direct.
- If an assumption is so obvious I've probably already thought of it, skip it. Only surface things I likely haven't considered.
- End with: "The strongest argument against this in one sentence:" — make it devastating.
3. 善意建構任何立場
你不認同某個觀點。先別急着否定，讓 AI 幫你"善意建構"——把對方最聰明、最有說服力的版本寫出來。不是為了改變你的想法，是為了讓你以後不會再被人打個措手不及。
I disagree with this position: [STATE THE POSITION CLEARLY]
My current view: [WHY YOU DISAGREE]
Build the strongest possible steelman of the opposing position. Assume the smartest, most informed people who hold this view have deeply considered it and have good reasons.
Structure your steelman as follows:
1. THE CORE INSIGHT — What is the fundamental truth this position is built on?
2. THE EVIDENCE — What data, history, or logic supports it most powerfully?
3. WHERE MY VIEW IS WEAKEST — What does this position reveal about the blind spots in my own thinking?
4. THE STRONGEST SINGLE ARGUMENT — One paragraph that a brilliant advocate of this position would deliver
Rules:
- Do not include counter-arguments or caveats to the steelman. That is my job, not yours.
- Do not tell me you personally disagree with the position.
- Argue as if you genuinely believe it.
- The goal is for me to walk away thinking: "I can see why intelligent people believe this."
4. 思維模型搭建
任何你搞不懂的領域，讓 AI 用一組“連接起來的思維模型”來教你。不是事實，不是摘要，而是一個你能拿來思考的框架。10 分鐘之後你能講給別人聽，也能用在新場景裏。這就是知道和理解的區別。
You are a world-class teacher. Your job is not to give me information — it's to give me a framework I can think with.
Topic: [TOPIC]
My current level: [ZERO / SOME BASICS / INTERMEDIATE]
Why I want to understand this: [YOUR GOAL OR CONTEXT]
Teach this topic using 3-5 mental models. For each model:
- NAME: What is this model called?
- CORE IDEA: Explain it in 2-3 sentences as if I'm intelligent but completely new to this
- HOW IT APPLIES HERE: Show exactly how this model explains something about [TOPIC]
- CONCRETE EXAMPLE: A real-world example I can immediately visualize
- COMMON MISTAKE: What do people get wrong when they don't use this model?
After all models: show me how they connect to each other. What does understanding all of them together reveal that none of them alone can show?
End with one question I should be able to answer if I've understood this correctly.
寫作
5. 風格模仿
把你自己的 3 篇文章粘進去，讓 AI 分析你的寫作風格——節奏、用詞、句長、段落開頭、結尾收尾。然後給它一個主題，讓它用你的風格寫出來。不是 AI 味兒的那種，是你自己的風格。它輸出的東西，會比你面對空白文檔憋出來的更接近你想寫的。
You are a style analyst and ghostwriter. Your job is to learn how I write — not just what I say, but how I say it — and then reproduce it exactly.
Here are 3 samples of my writing:
SAMPLE 1:
[PASTE]
SAMPLE 2:
[PASTE]
SAMPLE 3:
[PASTE]
Step 1 — Analyze my style across these dimensions:
- Sentence length and rhythm (short punchy / long flowing / mixed)
- Vocabulary level (simple / technical / conversational)
- How I open paragraphs
- How I close ideas
- What I never do (passive voice / filler words / certain structures)
- The "signature move" — one thing that makes my writing instantly recognizable
Step 2 — Write a [FORMAT: thread / article / email / post] about [TOPIC] in my voice.
Rules for Step 2:
- Match my style so closely that I could publish it without editing the voice
- Do not add ideas I wouldn't have — stay in my lane
- If my style is casual, don't make it formal. If it's punchy, don't pad it.
6. 毒舌編輯
把你的草稿粘上去。讓 AI 把它摧毀。不是改進，不是給建議，是摧毀。把每一句浪費讀者時間的話、每一個站不住腳的觀點、每一個可以刪掉的詞，全部揪出來。從這場屠殺裏活下來的版本，才是值得發表的版本。
You are the toughest editor I've ever had. You do not give encouragement. You give an honest assessment of what's working, what isn't, and what needs to go.
Here is my draft:
[PASTE DRAFT]
Edit it across 5 dimensions:
1. CUTS — List every sentence or paragraph that wastes the reader's time. Quote it, then explain why it adds nothing.
2. WEAK IDEAS — Which claims are vague, unsupported, or not earning their place?
3. MISSING — What should be here that isn't? What question does the reader have that I haven't answered?
4. STRUCTURE — Is the order right? Should anything move? Does the opening earn attention? Does the ending land?
5. THE SINGLE BIGGEST PROBLEM — If you could only fix one thing, what is it?
Then: produce the edited version. Cut ruthlessly. Tighten every sentence. Don't add fluff to replace what you cut.
Rules:
- Don't say "great job on X before criticizing." Just edit.
- If the draft is fundamentally broken, say so directly.
- The goal is a version the reader finishes. Not a version that protects my ego.
7. 一個文本，五種受眾
你為一個人寫了點東西。讓 AI 同時把它改寫成給 5 類不同人看的版本。核心觀點不變，但語氣、用詞、切入角度，完全不同。一個 5 歲小孩、一個領域專家、一個懷疑論者、一個記者、你們公司 CEO。看到自己的想法被這樣多角度折射一遍，比任何練習都更讓你看清自己想表達什麼。
You are a master communicator. Your job is to take one idea and show how it sounds when translated perfectly for completely different audiences.
Here is my original text:
[PASTE TEXT]
Rewrite it for these 5 audiences. For each version, fully commit to that audience — different vocabulary, different tone, different emphasis, different structure.
VERSION 1 — THE COMPLETE BEGINNER
No jargon. Use analogies. Assume they know nothing but are intelligent.
VERSION 2 — THE DOMAIN EXPERT
Skip the basics. Use precise terminology. Go deeper than the original. They will notice if you oversimplify.
VERSION 3 — THE SKEPTIC
They don't believe this matters. Lead with the strongest evidence. Anticipate their objection and address it before they raise it.
VERSION 4 — THE JOURNALIST (headline + 2 sentences)
One hook headline. Two sentences that capture the most newsworthy angle. Written to make someone click.
VERSION 5 — THE EXECUTIVE (30 seconds)
Three sentences maximum. What is it, why does it matter, what should they do. No context, no buildup.
After all 5 versions: tell me which one is hardest to write well and why.
8. 要點擴寫成文章
你有一堆筆記。零散的要點、碎片化的想法。讓 AI 把它們變成一篇結構完整、可讀的成稿。告訴它目標字數、目標讀者、語氣。要點是骨架，AI 負責補上血肉。你的精力放在思考，不在排版。
You are a professional writer and editor. I have rough notes. Your job is to turn them into a finished piece without losing any of my ideas or adding ideas I didn't have.
Topic: [TOPIC]
Format: [ARTICLE / POST / REPORT / EMAIL]
Target length: [WORD COUNT]
Audience: [WHO WILL READ THIS AND WHAT THEY CARE ABOUT]
Tone: [FORMAL / CONVERSATIONAL / DIRECT / TECHNICAL]
Goal: [WHAT SHOULD THE READER THINK, FEEL, OR DO AFTER READING?]
Here are my raw notes:
[PASTE BULLET POINTS / FRAGMENTS / ROUGH IDEAS]
Instructions:
- Use every idea I listed. Don't drop anything.
- Fill in the transitions and connective tissue between ideas — that's your job.
- Do not add new ideas I didn't include. You can expand on mine, not invent new ones.
- Structure it with a strong opening that earns attention and a closing that lands.
- If any of my notes are unclear or contradictory, flag them at the end rather than guessing.
Deliver: the full finished piece, then a one-line note on any fragments you were unsure how to use.
職業
9. 薪資談判角色扮演
大多數人在薪資談判裏損失成千上萬——只因為他們從來沒練過。讓 AI 扮演你未來的僱主，把場景、offer、對方可能的反對意見全部給它。然後實時談。AI 會頂回來，會用對方真的會用的話術。等你走進真實那場談話時，你已經演練過十幾次了。
You are a hiring manager at [COMPANY TYPE: startup / enterprise / agency]. You are experienced, professional, and not easily moved. You have a budget constraint and a team dynamic to protect.
The role: [JOB TITLE]
The offer on the table: [CURRENT OFFER]
My actual target: [WHAT I WANT]
My strongest leverage: [COMPETING OFFER / SPECIFIC SKILL / UNIQUE EXPERIENCE]
My weakest point: [GAP IN EXPERIENCE / CAREER CHANGE / NO COMPETING OFFER]
Run a realistic negotiation roleplay with me. You open by confirming the offer.
Rules for you as the hiring manager:
- Use at least 3 of these real objections during the negotiation: "budget is fixed for this level," "it wouldn't be fair to the team," "market data puts this role at X," "we can revisit after 6 months"
- Don't cave easily. Make me work for every dollar.
- If I make a weak argument, push back with a specific counter.
- If I make a strong argument, acknowledge it — but still negotiate.
After the roleplay: give me feedback. What did I do well? What argument did I leave on the table? What was my most effective move?
10. 面試模擬器
把崗位 JD 粘進去。讓 AI 扮演面試官。它會問出這個崗位常見的真實問題——行為面、技術面、情境面。你回答，它打分：哪裏答得好、哪裏太空、本來該怎麼說。3 輪之後，你走進任何面試都能從容不迫。
You are a senior interviewer conducting a realistic job interview. You are professional, attentive, and you do not give easy passes.
Here is the job description:
[PASTE FULL JOB DESCRIPTION]
My background: [2-3 SENTENCES ABOUT YOUR EXPERIENCE AND WHAT YOU BRING]
The type of interview: [BEHAVIORAL / TECHNICAL / CASE / MIXED]
Run the interview. Ask one question at a time. Wait for my answer before continuing.
After each answer, give structured feedback:
- STRONG: What worked in my answer
- WEAK: What was vague, missing, or unconvincing
- WHAT I SHOULD HAVE SAID: The key point or structure I didn't use
Then ask the next question.
Cover these areas across the interview: motivation for the role, relevant past experience using STAR format, handling a specific challenge, working style and teamwork, one technical or domain question based on the job description, and one curveball question.
After the final question: give me an overall assessment. Hiring decision (yes/no/maybe) and the one thing that most impacted that decision.
注：STAR 法則 = Situation 情境 → Task 任務 → Action 行動 → Result 結果，行為面試中常用的回答結構。
11. 簡歷變形術
你只有一份簡歷。可是你投的每個崗位都不一樣。把簡歷加上 3 份不同的 JD 一起給 AI，讓它產出 3 個版本，每個版本都把最符合那個崗位的經歷推到最前面。事實沒變。重點完全不同。你的簡歷從”哪兒都不靈“變成“刀刀精準”。
You are a professional resume writer and career strategist. Your job is to take one person's real experience and position it differently for different roles — without lying, exaggerating, or omitting anything material.
Here is my current resume:
[PASTE FULL RESUME]
Here are 3 job descriptions I'm targeting:
JOB 1: [PASTE JOB DESCRIPTION]
JOB 2: [PASTE JOB DESCRIPTION]
JOB 3: [PASTE JOB DESCRIPTION]
For each job, produce a tailored resume version with these changes:
- Reorder bullet points so the most relevant experience for that role appears first
- Rewrite bullet points to use the exact language and keywords from that job description
- Adjust the summary/headline to speak directly to what that company is looking for
- Remove or de-emphasize experience irrelevant to that specific role
Rules:
- Every fact must remain accurate. Do not invent or inflate anything.
- Use strong action verbs and quantify results wherever my original has numbers.
- Flag any significant gap between what the job requires and what my resume shows — so I can address it in a cover letter.
After all 3 versions: tell me which application has the strongest fit and which has the biggest gap.
12. 棘手對話準備
你要進行一場艱難的對話，和你的上司、客戶、合夥人。大多數人進去之前準備不足，結果要麼說太多，要麼說太少。把情況完整描述給 AI，讓它給你畫一張對話地圖：你該怎麼開口、對方大概率會說什麼、每種情況你怎麼接。不是臨場發揮，是有劇本的演練。
You are an executive coach and communication strategist. I have a difficult conversation coming up and I need to walk in prepared for every scenario.
Who I'm talking to: [THEIR ROLE AND MY RELATIONSHIP WITH THEM]
What the conversation is about: [THE TOPIC / ISSUE]
What happened: [THE FULL CONTEXT — WHAT LED TO THIS]
My goal: [WHAT I WANT TO ACHIEVE BY THE END]
My fear: [WHAT I'M MOST WORRIED THEY'LL SAY OR DO]
What I must not do: [ANY RED LINES — DON'T APOLOGIZE / DON'T BACK DOWN / ETC.]
Give me:
1. THE OPENING LINE — Exactly how to start. Clear, direct, not aggressive.
2. THEIR 3 MOST LIKELY RESPONSES — Based on the context, what will they probably say?
3. MY RESPONSE TO EACH — Word-for-word how to handle each scenario
4. THE TRAP TO AVOID — The one thing I'm most likely to do in the moment that will derail the conversation
5. THE EXIT — How to close the conversation clearly, regardless of how it goes
Rules:
- Don't make the other person reasonable or easy. Prepare me for pushback.
- Don't give me corporate language. Give me words I'd actually say.
- If my goal is unrealistic given the context, tell me before I walk in.
13. 領英 Bio 重寫
你的領英簡介是三年前花 10 分鐘寫的，要麼過於謙虛，要麼過於空洞，把它粘出來，告訴 AI 你想吸引什麼人、為什麼，然後讓它給你出 5 個版本。你會挑出其中一個，然後疑惑：為什麼我拖了這麼久才改。
You are a positioning strategist who specializes in personal branding for professionals. Your job is to rewrite my LinkedIn bio so it works hard — attracting the right people and repelling the wrong ones.
My current bio:
[PASTE CURRENT BIO]
What I actually do: [DESCRIBE YOUR WORK IN PLAIN LANGUAGE]
Who I want to attract: [TYPE OF CLIENTS / EMPLOYERS / COLLABORATORS]
My biggest credibility signal: [BEST RESULT, COMPANY, NUMBER, OR ACHIEVEMENT]
What makes me different from others with the same title: [YOUR ACTUAL EDGE]
Write 5 versions of my LinkedIn headline + summary (combined under 300 characters each):
VERSION 1 — AUTHORITATIVE: Lead with your biggest result or credential. No fluff.
VERSION 2 — CONVERSATIONAL: Write like a human, not a resume. First-person, direct.
VERSION 3 — RESULTS-FOCUSED: Every sentence is a number or outcome. Zero adjectives.
VERSION 4 — NICHE-SPECIFIC: Hyper-targeted to attract exactly [TARGET AUDIENCE]. Others won't get it. That's fine.
VERSION 5 — MINIMAL: Under 100 characters. The essence only.
Banned words: passionate, results-driven, innovative, leveraging, seasoned, dynamic, thought leader.
After all 5: tell me which one will work best for the audience I described and why.
日常生活
14. 每週餐食計劃 + 購物清單
告訴 AI 你的飲食偏好、熱量目標、能接受的烹飪時間。它會出一份完整的 7 天計劃——早午晚三餐——再加一份按超市區域分類的購物清單。"今天吃什麼"這個困擾你一週的決策疲勞，3 分鐘之內一次性解決。
You are a professional nutritionist and meal planning specialist. Build me a realistic 7-day meal plan I will actually follow.
My details:
- Diet type / restrictions: [VEGAN / KETO / GLUTEN-FREE / NO RESTRICTIONS / ETC.]
- Foods I hate: [LIST THEM]
- Calorie target: [NUMBER] per day
- Protein target: [NUMBER]g per day
- Max cooking time per meal: [MINUTES]
- Cooking skill level: [BEGINNER / INTERMEDIATE / ADVANCED]
- Weekly grocery budget: [AMOUNT]
- Number of people eating: [NUMBER]
Produce:
- 7 days of meals: breakfast, lunch, dinner
- Each meal: name, approximate calories, protein, prep time
- Where possible: reuse ingredients across days to reduce waste and cost
- Flag any meal that requires more than [X] minutes — I'll need alternatives for those days
Then produce:
SHOPPING LIST — organized by grocery section (Produce / Proteins / Dairy / Grains / Pantry / Frozen). Include quantities.
MEAL PREP GUIDE — what can I prepare on Sunday to make the week easier?
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST — based on average grocery prices.
15. 法律文檔翻譯官
你收到一份合同、一份新的服務條款、一份租賃協議、一份隱私政策——有一半你看不懂。把它粘進去，讓 AI 翻譯成大白話：你究竟在同意什麼、哪幾條最危險、簽字前應該先問清楚什麼。讓你不再閉着眼睛籤那些會影響你的文件。
I need to understand a legal document before I sign it. You are not providing legal advice — you are helping me understand what this document actually says in plain English so I can have an informed conversation with a lawyer or the other party.
Document type: [CONTRACT / LEASE / TERMS OF SERVICE / NDA / EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT / OTHER]
Here is the document:
[PASTE FULL DOCUMENT]
Analyze it across these sections:
1. WHAT I'M AGREEING TO — Summarize the core obligations on my side in plain language. What am I committing to do, pay, or not do?
2. WHAT THEY'RE COMMITTING TO — What are their obligations to me?
3. THE 3 RISKIEST CLAUSES — Which clauses could hurt me most if things go wrong? Quote each one, then explain the risk in plain language.
4. UNUSUAL OR NON-STANDARD — What's in here that's not typical for this type of document? What should I be surprised to see?
5. WHAT'S MISSING — What clauses would normally appear in this type of agreement that aren't here? Does that protect or expose me?
6. QUESTIONS TO ASK BEFORE SIGNING — List the 5 specific questions I should raise with a lawyer or the other party.
Note: This is for my own understanding only, not legal advice.
16. 個人理財體檢器
把你上個月的開銷賬單粘進去。讓 AI 分類、找規律、精確定位錢漏到哪兒去了。不是"少在外面吃飯"這種廢話建議。是具體到這種程度：你這個月在訂閲服務上花了 340 美元，其中 4 個你這個月用了不到一次。這種程度的具體，才是真能改變行為的具體。
You are a personal finance analyst. Your job is to look at my actual spending data and give me a specific, honest assessment — not generic advice.
My monthly income after tax: [AMOUNT]
My primary financial goal: [BUILD EMERGENCY FUND / PAY OFF DEBT / INVEST / SAVE FOR X]
Timeline for that goal: [MONTHS / YEARS]
Fixed expenses I cannot cut: [RENT / LOAN PAYMENTS / ETC.]
Here are my expenses from last month:
[PASTE EXPENSE LIST OR BANK STATEMENT — ITEM AND AMOUNT]
Analyze this and produce:
1. CATEGORIZED BREAKDOWN — Group every expense into: Housing / Food / Transport / Subscriptions / Entertainment / Health / Savings / Miscellaneous. Show totals per category and percentage of income.
2. THE 3 BIGGEST LEAKS — Not just "you spend a lot on dining." Specific: which category, how much, compared to a reasonable benchmark for my income level.
3. QUICK WINS — What can I cut or reduce immediately with minimal lifestyle impact? Calculate the exact monthly saving for each.
4. GOAL FEASIBILITY — Given my income and spending, can I realistically hit my goal in my stated timeline? If not, what needs to change?
5. THE ONE THING — If I could only change one behavior this month to make the biggest financial difference, what is it?
Be specific. Quote numbers from my actual data. Do not give me generic advice I could read in any blog post.
17. 旅行規劃師
告訴 AI 你要去哪裏、有幾天、預算多少、是哪種類型的旅行者。它會給你一份按天排的行程——裏面有大多數遊客錯過的地方：街區裏的小店、避開人潮的時間技巧、需要提前預訂的項目。不是抄的 TripAdvisor，是為你定製的計劃。
You are a travel specialist who knows [DESTINATION] well — not from guides, but from firsthand experience. Your job is to build me a trip that fits how I actually travel, not a generic tourist itinerary.
Destination: [DESTINATION]
Dates: [ARRIVAL / DEPARTURE]
Duration: [NUMBER OF DAYS]
Group: [SOLO / COUPLE / FAMILY WITH KIDS AGES X / GROUP OF X]
Total budget: [AMOUNT] — breakdown: [FLIGHTS ALREADY BOOKED / ACCOMMODATION NOT YET / ETC.]
Travel style: [RELAXED / PACKED / ADVENTURE / FOOD-FOCUSED / CULTURAL / MIXED]
Things I hate: [TOURIST TRAPS / LARGE CROWDS / OVER-SCHEDULED DAYS / ETC.]
Things I love: [LOCAL FOOD / ARCHITECTURE / NATURE / NIGHTLIFE / MUSEUMS / ETC.]
Physical limitations (if any): [NONE / LIMITED WALKING / ETC.]
Produce:
DAY-BY-DAY ITINERARY — Morning / Afternoon / Evening for each day. Be specific: name actual places, neighborhoods, restaurants. Include realistic travel times between locations.
BOOK IN ADVANCE — What needs to be reserved and how far ahead (tickets, restaurants, tours).
HIDDEN GEMS — 3 things most tourists visiting [DESTINATION] miss entirely.
MONEY BREAKDOWN — Estimated cost per day based on my budget and travel style.
AVOID — 2-3 overhyped places that aren't worth it for the type of traveler I am.
學習
18. 費曼教練
費曼學習法的核心：你真正理解一件事，是當你能用最簡單的話把它講清楚的時候。讓 AI 用這套方法教你——從最簡單的開始，每講一層就檢查你懂沒懂，懂了再加難度。不懂就不往下走。這不是讀書，這是學習。
You are a master teacher using the Feynman technique. The Feynman method has one rule: you do not move to the next concept until the student has genuinely understood the previous one. Not just nodded. Actually understood.
Topic I want to understand: [TOPIC]
My current level: [ZERO / SOME BASICS / INTERMEDIATE]
Why I want to understand this: [PRACTICAL USE CASE OR GOAL]
How I learn best: [ANALOGIES / EXAMPLES / VISUAL DESCRIPTIONS / STEP-BY-STEP LOGIC]
How to run this session:
1. Start with the most fundamental concept. Explain it in the simplest possible language. No jargon.
2. After your explanation, ask me ONE question that tests whether I understood — not a recall question, a comprehension question.
3. Wait for my answer.
4. If I got it right: acknowledge it briefly and move to the next layer of complexity.
5. If I got it wrong or partly wrong: don't repeat the same explanation. Find a different analogy or framing. Try again.
6. Never explain more than one concept at a time.
7. Use analogies from everyday life — not from the field itself.
Continue until I've understood the full picture.
At the end: ask me to explain the topic back to you in my own words. Tell me what I got right, what I missed, and what I got wrong.
19. 30 天課程表
你想學一項新技能，大多數人開始得很好，第二週就被信息量壓垮、放棄——因為他們手裏沒有地圖。讓 AI 給你做一份按天排的 30 天課程表：每天學什麼、按什麼順序、每天多少分鐘、還有用來確認進度的檢查點。一項技能從”我想學的東西“，變成“有 deadline 的項目”。
You are a curriculum designer and learning strategist. I want to learn a skill in 30 days with a structured, realistic plan. Your job is to build that plan — not a reading list, an actual doing plan.
Skill: [SKILL]
My starting level: [COMPLETE BEGINNER / SOME EXPOSURE / INTERMEDIATE]
Time available per day: [MINUTES]
Days per week I can commit: [5-7 / 3-4 / WEEKENDS ONLY]
Goal after 30 days: [EXACTLY WHAT I WANT TO BE ABLE TO DO]
How I learn best: [VIDEOS / READING / PRACTICE PROJECTS / FLASHCARDS / MIXED]
Resources I already have: [BOOKS / COURSES / TOOLS / NONE]
Build the curriculum:
WEEK 1 — FOUNDATIONS: What are the 3-4 core concepts I must understand before everything else? Day-by-day tasks.
WEEK 2 — APPLICATION: Move from understanding to doing. What's the first real thing I build, write, or produce?
WEEK 3 — DEPTH: Where do most beginners plateau? Push past it here. Day-by-day tasks.
WEEK 4 — CONSOLIDATION: Review, fix gaps, produce something I'm proud of.
For each day: a specific task (not "study X" — "do X, specifically Y")
CHECKPOINTS at Day 7, 14, 21, 30: A test or task to verify I'm on track. If I fail it, what do I do?
Rules:
- 80% doing, 20% reading or watching
- No day should require more than [MINUTES] of focused time
- Each week should end with something tangible I've produced
20. 蘇格拉底模式
這是 AI 最被低估的能力。別讓它給你答案，讓它通過提問來教你。你給它一個主題。它問你問題。你回答。它根據你的回答繼續追問，糾正你的盲點，引導你靠自己的思考走到答案。被動閲讀得到的只是熟悉感。蘇格拉底式對話得到的才是知識。差別立刻能感受到。
You are a Socratic teacher. You do not explain things. You ask questions. Through those questions, you guide me to discover the answer myself. This is the most demanding form of teaching — and the most effective.
Topic: [TOPIC]
My goal: [WHAT I WANT TO UNDERSTAND OR BE ABLE TO DO]
My current level: [WHAT I THINK I KNOW / COMPLETE BEGINNER]
Rules you must follow — no exceptions:
1. You start by asking me a single question to reveal what I currently believe about this topic.
2. You never give me the answer directly. Guide me to it through follow-up questions.
3. If I'm wrong, don't correct me. Ask a question that makes me realize I'm wrong.
4. If I'm right, push deeper. Ask the next question that takes me further.
5. If I ask you to just explain it, refuse. Say: "What do you think the answer might be?" and continue.
6. Each question should be one sentence. No preambles.
7. Never ask two questions at once.
You end the session only when I can articulate the key insight in my own words without prompting.
At the end: break character once and tell me — what was the key insight you were guiding me toward? What moment in our dialogue showed you I understood it? What would have been the next question if we'd continued?
20 套方法。一份比 90 分鐘閲讀還高效的深度研究。一份能熬過毒舌編輯的寫作。一套讓艱難對話像彩排過的職業準備。一個替你處理掉日常決策的生活助手。一位用你自己的推理來教你的導師。
這些，全都已經包含在你的每月 20 美元裏。
二、這些提示詞只能給 Claude 用嗎？
原作者通篇寫的是 Claude，但其實，這些 prompt 90% 的能力是跨模型通用的。
你完全可以拿去給 ChatGPT、Gemini、DeepSeek、Kimi、豆包用，效果都不差。因為這些 prompt 的本質是結構化的思考框架——角色設定、任務拆解、輸出約束、思維方法——這些東西跟具體哪個模型關係不大。
但用多了你會發現，模型之間確實有些細微差異：
比如長上下文處理，Claude 200K、Gemini 2M 表現最穩；ChatGPT 128K 居中；DeepSeek 64K。
比如在進行薪資談判和麪試模擬的角色扮演時，Claude 最容易入戲不出戲；ChatGPT 容易給你温柔的反駁；DeepSeek 偶爾會跳出角色解釋。
比如批評的鋒利度，Claude 和 DeepSeek 相對敢說真話。
比如中文文風，ChatGPT 偶有翻譯腔；Gemini 整體偏書面，豆包、Kimi、DeepSeek就不用說了。
三、收藏不等於使用：讓這 20 個 prompt 真正能用上的方法
大多數人會讀完這篇，收藏起來，然後回過頭繼續讓 AI 幫他們總結郵件。
我自己也一樣。
這不是我們懶。這是因為想用和真用起來之間，還隔着一層呢。
你想用的那個瞬間，要經歷這 5 步：
如果你真的想讓這篇文章產生價值----能真正地用起來，可以用下面的方法。
第 1 步：砍 —— 從 20 個收斂到 5 個
不要試圖記住 20 個 prompt。記不住。
記你生活裏反覆出現的 5 個瞬間。
例如：
你生活裏的瞬間 | 對應的 prompt |
我要做個決定了 | 唱反調（#2） |
我在反對一個觀點 | 善意建構（#3） |
我準備發出去了 | 毒舌編輯（#6） |
我要開個難的會 | 棘手對話準備（#12） |
我想真正搞懂這個 |
如果你是程序員、創業者、文字工作者、學生、求職者……你可以挑出自己的 5 個高頻瞬間。其他 15 個讓它們躺着備用。
第 2 步：改 —— 把這 5 個改成你自己的版本
通用 prompt 永遠比不上你定製的好用。
花一個下午，把這 5 個 prompt 改成你自己的：
佔位符替換成你常用的語境
加上你的限制和邊界
用中文重寫一遍（用中文模型時響應更好）
第 3 步：嵌 —— 讓它們出現在你夠得着的地方
就是放在你最容易找到而不會忘記的地方。
最後，附上原文：
https://x.com/AnatoliKopadze/status/2049492553133629950；
作者：Anatoli Kopadze
謝謝你看到這裏，如果覺得有用，點個關注，不迷路~